Posts Tagged ‘wedge issues’

h1

When Is Sex Not Personal?

2008.November.11

First, check this out. If you or anyone you know has been in this situation, congratulations, you live in a world of postmodern sexuality.

Perhaps the only union more awkward than politics and religion is that of politics and sexuality. And wouldn’t you know, it’s tied to those convenient wedge issues the Dems and Reps love to throw at us: if you have a friend or family member who is gay, you have to vote Democratic or you’re forcing them back into the closet. If you have any hesitations about abortion, you have to vote Republican or they’ll become mandatory and paid for with taxes on your fingernail clippings.

Nope, there couldn’t possibly be such aberrations as pro-life Democrats, or gay Republicans.

The difficulty with sexuality as a political issue is that, like religion, it is next to impossible to divorce from the personal experience of each and every voter. Say you had a homoerotic dream one time, does that make you a Democrat? Say you heard about someone who’s had four abortions and you think that’s just too many, does that make you a Republican? Of course not, but because sexuality is so personal, it inspires intense reactions in both extremes, leaving little room for gray on the issues.

To me, one of the funniest things is how sexual politics doesn’t necessarily correspond to one’s sexual proclivities. The most ardent supporters of abortion rights use protection so as not to need them. Most of the gay men I know struggle with their identity not only because their love is forbidden, but because they don’t feel like they have a complete choice in forming that identity. Do I identify as an athlete first? An artist? A father? Or am I relegated to always being a gay athlete, a gay artist, or a gay father? I recently mentioned how Black Americans are struggling over whether to identify gay rights with civil rights, but both peoples have been forced to experience how one piece of individual identity can so easily overshadow all others – regardless of whether it is your preferred identifier.

Wedge issues cause polarization within the broader American community, but they can even polarize the communities FORMED by the division, by forcing members to fight for mainstream recognition by going mainstream or fight for the fringe since that’s the only place you can be yourself. As gay men have come to a more prominent visibility, they have to struggle to develop individual or even community identities beyond stereotypes and pavlovian associations. Admit it, when you think of gay men, you think of pink clothing, musicals, interior decorating, and BUTT SEX. Where is there room for a personal or political identity beyond that?

Does sex ever get to be personal for those whose own American identity is designated for them based on one dimension of lives that are otherwise no more or less complicated than anyone else’s?

If I may offer a conjecture, it is not solely the responsibility of these individuals to ask such questions. “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” We must each (not in spite of our individual proclivities but in celebration of them) recognize that any sexual act is pissing someone off somewhere, and therefor embrace love itself as an act of rebellion.

Advertisements
h1

All Over But the Voting

2008.November.1

Early voting has ended here in Texas. I cast my ballot Friday morning on a flat digital tablet resembling an oversized Game Boy. I have reservations about electronic voting, but as I will be working the polls all day Tuesday, it was an absolute necessity.

For the curious, I voted on 17 races. Here was the breakdown:

  • 10 Democrats
  • 5 Libertarians
  • 2 Republicans

I do not vote in uncontested “races”, because they are undemocratic. Why put them on the ballot at all? If you include them, at least allow a referendum on the incumbent. It is another consequence of the pendulum swing of partisan politics – when the pendulum swings far to one side, the other side just stops bothering to show up until the party in power screws up and reap the electoral rewards. How is that a healthy discourse on the direction of our republic?

More importantly, I did not vote straight ticket. It wasn’t just a matter of supporting good candidates regardless of their party affiliations (which I did) or encouraging third party candidates wherever it seemed reasonable (and in Texas, sometimes Dems are the third party)… it is foremost to me a move that conveys accountability to those powers that would woo my vote. Ideologically, yeah, I have a lot in common with the Democrats. Or, I should say, they support my values more often. But a political party is an apparatus of communal convenience, and convenience is the modern enemy of freedom. As a party shifts (and all objects in motion stay in motion), I will find that some positions shift away from my own values, and other positions hold little water once in office. As its leaders attain and maintain success, the party grows lazy, corrupt, and/or desensitized, and the pendulum will inevitably have to swing back the other way. Think of it as a market correction for our political development. Just as with the stock market, a volatile political scene should be considered undesirable, even when you are the one who (temporarily) profits – because extremes are another correction waiting to happen. True progress comes from slow and steady growth.

Voters who opt for straight-ticket voting (especially those who do so consistently, and not as part of a specific statement on a party’s platform) are falling in line without asking questions, without hearing all options, and without asking themselves tough questions. Not only do you take the party’s worthiness (and dare I say infallibility) for granted, but you invite that party to take YOU for granted. If you let yourself be permanently defined by one label or one issue, you are opening the door for a party to undermine every other value you might otherwise have and your power loses much weight.

Parties never waste time vying for the support of its staunchest straight-ticket voters (well, almost never). Often, when a party realizes that its sheep are beginning to stray, they will bring forth a wedge issue to corral the base for another four years. But eventually real issues come to the fore and the pendulum swings once again. Freed from their haze of ignorance, voters will look back and say, “Wow, how did we let that last bunch in? Let’s stick with these other guys instead!” and forge a new generation of blind attachment.

Straight tickets also run the risk of promoting candidates who are not actually qualified for their offices. Let’s face it, somewhere in every town or state, there is some nut who runs for some office every two years, just to build up some name recognition and catch a partisan wave down the line. Neither Democrats nor Republicans are any more guilty than the other. Swinging back is necessary for balance after a period of extreme partisanship (such as the last eight years), but no reasonable Democrat can guarantee you on November 5th that each victorious candidate with a D by his or her name was the best qualified. Someone will ride the coattails and be in the right place at the right time with the right letter on the ballot.

If you didn’t early vote, do some research. Visit your local county’s election office (most have great websites) and get a good look at your sample ballot. Google each name and read the media recommendations (watching for slant – most newspapers are sadly just as guilty of partisan opinions as the rest of us) and write down the names of each candidate you support. And you know what? Even if you decide that each Democrat, or every Republican, or every Christian-Green-Anarcho-Libertarian is truly your candidate and warrants your vote, check them off individually. Because the parties track every tick on the ballot, and while they will not know how you as an individual voted, they will know how many ballots took the shortcut and how many took the long way. They must know the limits of their own power in your precinct, because every American citizen deserves to have candidates fight for your vote. Every time.

%d bloggers like this: